Introduction to the Life and Work of Jean Delville

Brendan Cole

Jean Delville ( born: 19 January 1867, Leuven – died: 19 January 1953, Forest, Brussels) was a Belgian symbolist painter, writer, poet, polemicist, teacher, and Theosophist. Delville was the leading exponent of the Belgian Idealist movement in art during the 1890s. He held, throughout his life, the belief that art should be the expression of a higher spiritual truth and that it should be based on the principle of Ideal, or spiritual Beauty. He executed a great number of paintings during his active career from 1887 to the end of the second World War (many now lost or destroyed) expressing his Idealist aesthetic. Delville was trained at the Académie des Beaux-arts in Brussels and proved to be a highly precocious student, winning most of the prestigious competition prizes at the Academy while still a young student. He later won the Belgian Prix de Rome which allowed him to travel to Rome and Florence and study at first hand the works of the artists of the Renaissance. During his time in Italy he created his celebrated masterpiece L’Ecole de Platon (1898), which stands as a visual summary of his Idealist aesthetic which he promoted during the 1890s in his writings, poetry and exhibitions societies, notably the Salons d’Art Idéaliste.

Characteristically, Delville’s paintings are idea-based, expressing philosophical ideals derived from contemporary hermetic and esoteric traditions. His esoteric perspective was mostly influenced by the work of Eliphas Levi, Edouard Schuré and Saint-Yves d’Alveydre, and later in his career, the Theosophical writings of Helena Blavatsky and Annie Besant. The main underlying theme of his paintings, especially during his early career, has to do with initiation and the transfiguration of the inner life of the soul towards a higher spiritual purpose. Specifically they deal with themes symbolising Ideal love, death and transfiguration as well as representations of Initiates (‘light bringers’), and the relationship between the material and metaphysical dimensions. His paintings and finished drawings are an expression of a highly sensitive visionary imagination articulated through precisely observed forms drawn from nature. He also had a brilliant gift for colour and composition and excelled in the representation of human anatomy. Many of his major paintings, such as his Les Trésors de Sathan (1895), l’Homme-Dieu (1903) and Les Ames errantes (1942), represent dozens of figures intertwined in complex arrangements and painted with highly detailed anatomical accuracy. He was an astonishingly skilled draughtsman and painter capable of producing works on a very large scale, many of which can be seen in public buildings in Brussels, including the Palais de Justice.

Delville’s artistic style is strongly influenced by the Classical tradition. He was a lifelong advocate of the value of the Classical training taught in the Academies. He believed that the discipline acquired as a result of this training was not as an end in itself, but rather a valuable means of acquiring a solid drawing and painting technique to allow artists freely to develop their personal artistic style without inhibiting their individual creative personality. Delville was a respected Academic art teacher. He was employed at the Glasgow School of Art from 1900 to 1906 and as Professor of drawing at the Académie des Beaux-arts in Brussels thereafter until 1937.

He was also a prolific and talented writer. He published a very great number of journal articles during his lifetime as well as four volumes of poetry, including his Le Frisson du Sphinx (1897) and Les Splendeurs Méconnues (1922). He authored more than a dozen books and pamphlets relating to art and esoteric subjects. The most important of his published books include his esoteric works, Dialogue entre Nous (1895) and Le Christ Reviendra (1913) as well as his seminal work on Idealist art, La Mission de l’Art (1900). He also created and edited several contemporary journals and newspapers during the 1890s promoting his Idealist aesthetic including L’Art Idéaliste and La Lumière.

Delville was an energetic artistic entrepreneur, creating several influential artistic exhibition societies, including Pour l’Art and the Salons de l’Art Idéaliste in the 1890s and later, the Société de l’Art Monumental in the 1920s which was responsible for the decoration of public buildings including the mosaics in the hemicycle of the Cinquantenaire in Brussels. He also founded the very successful Coopérative artistique, which provided affordable art materials for artists at the time.

Early years and training

Delville was born on 19 January 1867 at 2.00 a.m., rue des Dominicains in Louvain. He was born illegitimate into a working class household. His mother was Barbe Libert (1833-1905), the daughter of a canal worker who earned a living as a ‘journalière’ as an adult. Delville never knew his father Joachim Thibault who was a lecturer in Latin and Greek at a local college and who came from a bourgeoise family. He bore his mother’s name until she married a functionary working in Louvain, Victor Delville (1840-1918). Victor adopted Jean who, until then, was known as Jean Libert. The family moved to Brussels in 1870 and settled in Boulevard Waterloo near Porte de Hal. The Delville family later moved to St Gilles where Delville began his schooling at the Ecole Communale in rue du Fort.
Delville took an early interest in drawing, even though his initial career ambitions were to become a Doctor. He was introduced to the artist Stiévenart by his adoptive grandfather, François Delville, while still a young boy. Delville recalls that this was ‘the first artist I had ever seen, and for me, as a child, still unaware of my vocation, this was an enchanting experience.’
At the age of twelve, Delville entered the famous Athénée Royale in Brussels. His interest in art developed around this time and he received his father’s permission to enrol in evening drawing classes at the Académie des Beaux-arts in the rue du Midi in 1879. He entered the course for drawing ‘après la tête antique’ (after the classical head) and in 1882 classes for drawing ‘après le torse et figure’ (after torso and face). Soon after he gave up his schooling at the Athénée to study full-time at the Académie. In 1883, he enrolled in the ‘cours de peinture d’après nature’ (class in painting after nature) under the direction of the celebrated teacher Jean-François Portaels (1818-1895). Portaels objected to Delville’s youth, but he excelled in the entrance examination and was unconditionally admitted to study painting under Portaels and Joseph Stallaert. Delville was a precocious talent and at the age of only 17 he won many of the major prizes at the Academy including ‘drawing after nature’, ‘painting after nature’, ‘historical composition’ (with high distinction), ‘drawing after the antique’, and ‘figure painting’.

Artistic career 1887-1900

L’Essor, 1887-1891

Delville first exhibited in a public context at the moderate exhibition society called l’Essor from 1887 to 1891. His early works were largely depictions of working class -and peasant life executed in a contemporary realist style influenced by Constant Meunier. Delville’s early efforts exhibited in 1887 were largely favourably reviewed in the contemporary press, notably l’Art Moderne and the Journal de Bruxelles, even if they were seen to be eclectic and derivative of the works of older established artists. These included works inspired by Baudelaire’s poetry including his Frontispiece and L’épave (now lost) and his main work La Terre of which a detailed drawing still survives.
The following year his works were singled out as among the most outstanding of the 1888 exhibitors at L’Essor. This was the year in which he exhibited his highly controversial study for his painting La Mère depicting a woman in labour. A contemporary review described it in the following: ‘On a huge bed with purple sheets … a dishevelled standing woman displays her nudity as she writhes in spasmodic movements, bending under the pains of childbirth. Her face is contorted, her gnashing teeth alternate with the curse, her clenched hands lift the bed cover over her belly in an unconscious reflex of modesty … abominable vision ….! and poor women!’ This subject, rarely depicted in art, was seen to be shocking and contrary to bourgeois taste. It does however signal an aspect of Delville’s art to depict ideas that are vivid and provocative.

During the 1880s, Delville’s work tended towards social realism. This included images of workers and peasants (Soir and Paysan, 1888); of beggars and destitution (Asile de nuit, 1885); of hunger (L’Affamé,1887) and ultimately of death (Le Dernier Sommeil, 1888). Here he focussed on themes of poverty, despair and hopelessness. In an undated drawing titled Le las d’Aller Delville depicts a fallen figure curled up on his side in a barren landscape, asleep, or perhaps even dead. However, during the period 1888-9 his artistic interests started developing in a more non-realist direction and began to move towards Idealism which dominated his work from then on. This was first indicated in his Fragment d’une composition: Le cycle de la passion (now lost) displayed at L’Essor on 1889. The final work Le Cycle passionnel (9 x 6 metres) was displayed at L’Essor the following year (1890) and was inspired by Dante’s Divine Comedy. It depicts a vast composition of intertwined figures floating through the nether regions of hell. The theme concerns lovers who have succumbed to their erotic passions. One of the main themes of initiation is to control one’s lower passions in order to achieve spiritual transcendence. This painting of this work represents this idea in metaphoric form. This is an early major work by Delville sadly destroyed in the incendiary attack on Louvain in 1914. Despite its importance, it was not received with much enthusiasm in the contemporary press.
Another work that display Delville’s growing interest in non-realist ideas during the 1880s is his more well-knownTristan et Yseult (Royal Museums of Fine Art, Brussels, 1887). The work is inspired by Wagner’s eponymous opera and deals with the relationship between love and death and the idea of transcendence that can be achieved through both. It is an early work that reveals themes closely related to the initiatory tradition which is fully discussed in Brendan Cole’s recent book on Delville.
A further important work dealing with non-realist, or Idealist, subject matter was exhibited by Delville at the final L’Essor exhibition in 1891 titled La Symbolisation de la chair et de l’ésprit (the original is lost, but a detailed study recently came up for auction). It depicts a naked female figure dragging a nude male beath the water. Bright light appears above the male figure while dark sub-aquatic vegetation surrounds the base of the female. The initiatory theme here is self-evident in its depiction of the conflict between spirit (light) and matter (dark vegetation). The male aspires towards the light but is dragged down towards the bottom of the dark mass of water. The work establishes an essential duality between consciousness/unconsciousness, light/dark, as well as spirituality and materialism. In Delville’s writings he emphasises this duality and its reconciliation; a theme that pervades much of Symbolist art and writings and was conspicuous amongst Romantic artists as well, especially the writings of Goethe. The theme dominates Delville’s art. He wrote that:

‘Men have two very distinct trends in them. One of these two trends is physical, which must, of course, provide for his preservation by physical means, having the task of sustaining tangible life, sustaining the body. The other trend, which is not only immaterial but indefinable, is that which arises as a perpetual aspiration beyond the material, for which this world is not enough: it is this ‘something else’ that overcomes all distances or is, rather, unknowable. This is the very threshold of the occult world, in front of which all science, seized with unsteadiness, prostrates itself in the insuperable premonition of a world beyond!’

Pour L’Art 1892-1895

Delville’s growing interest in Idealist art led him to instigate a succession from L’Essor to start a new exhibition society called Pour L’Art. Many of the younger artists of L’Essor followed him which led to the dissolution of that group. Pour L’Art became one of the noted avant-garde exhibition societies on Brussels at the time. The leading avant-garde exhibition forum at the time was Les XX. Following Les XX, Pour L’Art invited international artists as well, several of whom became well known in Symbolist circles, including Carlos Schwabe, Alexandre Séon, Chales Filiger and Jan Verkade. Their first exhibition took place in November 1892 and the works displayed were executed in either an Impressionist or Symbolist idiom. Delville designed the poster for the first exhibition depicting a long-necked sphinx – a key symbol of the period – cupping a flaming chalice in her hands. Delville’s main work of that year was his L’Idole de la Perversité which can be considered one of the major images of the period. The new group received a largely positive press during the time. The group was closely associated with Joséphin Péladan’s Salons de la Rose+Croix in Paris, and Péladan was frequently invited to lecture in Brussels at the time by members of the Pour L’Art group.
The second exhibition of the Pour L’Art group took place in January 1894. Significantly the society also included the applied, or decorative arts, which were become widely popular at the time and a particular feature of Art Nouveau. Tapestries, bookbindings, and wrought-iron work was displayed alongside the paintings. The influence of Delville and Péladan was evident in the predominance of idealist works of art influenced by late fifteenth-century Florentine art, the work of Gustav Moreau, Puvis de Chavannes and the tendency towards large-scale figure compositions. The show was enthusiastically received by the press.
Delville’s main works exhibited that year was his celebrated La Mort d’Orphée (1893, Royal Museums of Fine Art, Brussels) and his outstanding Mysteriosa or Portrait of Mrs Stuart Madame Stuart Merrill (1892, Royal Museums of Fine Art, Brussels). His work was enthusiastically praised in the press. The leading critic Ernest Verlant wrote:

One of the principal members of the Pour L’Art group, in view of his talent and astonishing fecundity, is Jean Delville, who is also a writer and a poet; with a powerful imagination that is funereal and tormented. These epithets are equally suited to his large painting La Proie, a crimson vision of apocalyptic murder, similar to his vast composition from last year, Vers l’inconnu, and of several before that. … Here and there, for example, in L’homme du glaive, the Murmure profane, and Mysteriosa, he pushes the intensity of expression to its extreme. Elsewhere, as in Satana, he draws together, rather bizarrely, esoteric attributes in a figure derived from da Vinci. But we are able only to express praise in front of Orphée, a dead head floating between the shafts of a large lyre; in front of Elegia, a long and supple female body appearing under the spurting and cascading waters of a fountain; in front of Au Loin and Maternitas, two figures pensively leaning on their elbows, of which the first of the two has a great nobility. These works are monochrome, or nearly so. Their expression is accurate, fine, subtle, refined, not too explicit, and all the more eloquent.

The final Pour L’Art show took place in January 1895. Delville also participated for the last time in Péladan’s Salons de la Rose+Croix. This was the year when he began preparing the formation of his own exclusively Idealist exhibition Society, the Salons d’Art Idéaliste, which opened the following year. By this time the Pour L’Art Salons were well-established, successful and enthusiastically supported by the contemporary press. Delville’s L’Ange des splendeurs (1894, Royal Museums of Fine Art, Brussels), was Delville’s main work of that show. Although not widely praised it stands, according to Brendan Cole, as one of his initiatory paintings par excellence of Delville’s oeuvre

Delville and Péladan’s Salons de la Rose+Croix 1892-1895

Delville exhibited at Joséphin Péladan’s Rosicrucian Salons for the first four years of their existence (1892-5), which coincided with his own Pour l’Art Salons. At this time Delville was closely allied to Péladan and his ideals. Delville probably met Péladan in Paris when he accompanied one of the touring exhibitions of L’Essor, around 1888. Delville shared Péladan’s concept of creating a forum that showcased art of an exclusively Idealist persuasion. Delville sought to bring Idealist art into the public eye in Belgium through the Pour l’Art salons, but more specifically in the Salons d’Art Idéalist which he founded in 1895 and opened to the public in 1896. By 1896, Delville began severing formal ties with Péladan, which cleared the way for his move towards Theosophy later that decade. Delville records his association with Péladan in his autobiography: ‘… my personality as an idealist painter emerged more and more. I made the acquaintance of Péladan and became interested in and started participating in the esoteric movement in Paris and Brussels. I exhibited at the Rosicrucian Salon where only idealist art was allowed. Péladan exhibited several of my works there, notably La Mort d’Orphée which he placed at the centre of the exhibition, along with La chair et l’esprit and some drawings. Under his influence, I went to live in Paris where I stayed on the Quai Bourbon among some Rosicrucian friends, disciples of Péladan. I stayed there for several months occupying my time not only with the organization of the Péladanesque salons, but also in painting the set of Babylone which was an overall success’
In 1892 Delville exhibited his La symbolisation de la chair et de l’esprit (which was reproduced in the catalogue to the first exhibition) as well as his l’Idole de la Perversité. In 1893 he exhibited eight works including his Imperia, Élegia, La symbolisation de la chair et de l’esprit, L’Annonciateur, Le Murmure profane, Mysteriosa, Vers l’Inconnu, and L’Homme de Glaive. In 1894 he exhibited seven works including: La Mort d’Orphée, La Fin d’un règne, Le Geste d’Ame, Satana, Maternitas, Etude féminine and La Tranquille. In 1895 Delville exhibited four works including his portrait of Péladan: Portrait du Grand Maître de la Rose+Croix en habit de choeur and L’Ange des splendeurs. Many of these works would be displayed in Brussels as well in Delville’s Poul l’Art exhibitions.

Prix de Rome and sojourn in Italy, 1895

Delville lived as an indigent artist in St Gilles in Brussels during the course of his early career. By the middle of the 1890s he was married and had a growing family which he struggled to support as an artist. On the advice of his close friend, the sculptor Victor Rousseau, he was motivated to enter the prestigious Prix de Rome, which came with a very generous bursary that also covered the costs for a lengthy sojourn in Italy. Delville won the 1895 competition, but his entry created a controversy amongst his peers given the ‘Establishment’ nature of the Prix that ran counter to the ideals of the avant-garde at the time. Delville was by then a fairly established figure in avant-garde circles and his association with the Prix de Rome appeared to be a betrayal of their cause. The Prix de Rome, however, also meant that Delville could spend a significant amount of time in Italy studying the Classical art of the Renaissance that he admired so much.
The rules of the competition were stringent. Competitors were isolated in small studios in the Academy of Fine Arts in Antwerp which ran the competition and were expected to produced a finished drawing of their composition before setting to work on the final painting. A strict time-limit was imposed on competitors to finish the work. The competition opened in June 1895 and he winner was announced in October. The theme of the competition that year was Le Christ glorifié par les enfants. Delville recorded his experience in his autobiography:

The rules were demanding … At that time the six selected competitors for the final exam had to paint their work in a secluded lodge, after leaving the original preliminary drawing in a hallway of the Antwerp Academy. It was strictly forbidden to bring any drawings into the lodge, only live models were allowed there. While working on their painting, the competitors had to change their clothes each time they entered their lodge, after having been visited by a specially appointed supervisor. These procedural requirements were the moral guarantee of this great contest in which these artists from the country took part…. As soon as they were selected, they entered into a lodge in order to produce, over three days, the sketch of the requisite painting, and they were given eighty days to complete it without receiving any visitors or advice from anyone – in order to ensure that the competitors were the unique and personal author of the work so that the jury, composed of the country’s most well-known artists, could cast a definitive judgement.

During his stay Delville was expected to paint original works reflecting his studies of classical art as well as to make copies after the old masters. He was also expected to send regular reports back to the Antwerp Academy relating to his work there. The experience proved to be a turning point in his career and brought to focus his ideal to synthesise the classical tendency in art with his interest in esoteric philosophy which was the defining attribute of his Idealist aesthetic form then onwards. Delville produced several remarkable paintings during his time in Rome that reflect a dramatic evolution in his art towards a more refined expression of this Idealist aesthetic. These included his outstanding Orphée aux enfers (1896), a key initiatory work, as well as his great masterpiece of the period, his L’Ecole de Platon (1898), which he exhibited at the 1898 Salon d’Art Idéalist to universal praise.
In 1895, Delville published his fist book on esoteric philosophy, Dialogue entre Nous.

The Salons d’Art Idéaliste 1896-1898

Delville’s Salons D’Art Idéaliste were exclusively devoted to exhibiting artwork of an Idealist nature. Delville signalled his programme in a series of polemical articles during the course of the months preceding the opening of the first Salon, which created some controversy amongst his contemporaries. Delville’s ideas were bold and confrontational, but it was characteristic of him to stick to the courage of his convictions and to carry his projects through with relentless energy and determination. The aim of the Salons were couched in a short manifesto published before the opening of the first Salon. This is an early instance of a new avant-garde art movement supported by a manifesto; something that would be a commonplace in later Modernist movements and after. The Salons were also accompanied by a series of lectures and musical soirées. Delville’s Salons were also significant for their inclusion of women artists, something almost unheard of in other contemporary avant garde exhibition societies. The manifesto provides a valuable record of the Idealist movement founded by Delville:

The intention of the Salons d’Art Idéaliste is to give rise to an aesthetic Renaissance in Belgium. They bring together, in one annual grouping, all the scattered elements of artistic idealism, that is to say, works with the same leanings towards beauty. Wishing in this way to react against the decadence, against the confusion of the so-called realist, impressionist or libriste schools (degenerate art forms), the Salons d’Art Idéaliste champion the following as eternal principles of perfection in a work of art: thought, style, and technique The only thing they recognize as free, within aesthetics, is the creative personality of the artist, and maintain, in the name of harmony, that no work is susceptible to true art unless it is composed of the three absolute terms, namely: spiritual beauty, plastic beauty and technical beauty. Similar, if not identical, to the Parisian Rose & Croix Salons created by Sâr Joséphin Péladan and to the Pre-Raphaelite movement in London, the Salons d’Art Idéaliste claim to wish to continue, through modern developments, the great tradition of idealist art, from the ancient masters to present-day masters.

Delville’s main work exhibited that year was his visionary Trésors de Sathan (1895, Royal Museums of Fine Art, Brussels). The work had previously been on show at the Salon de Gand. The depiction of a satanic figure represented under water was unique in Western Art. Instead of wings he is represented with long octopus tentacles. His ‘treasures’ are the sleeping figures surrounded with jewels and gold coins; objects representing materialism and avarice. The figures show no sign of torment, but are rather represented in a state of somnolent bliss, as though they have succumbed to all that is ‘satanic’ in Delville’s occult view; sensual pleasure and materialism. The work is an apotropaic icon against the snares of the lower passions and the world of matter and sensuality generally.
The second Salon took place in March 1897 at Edmond Picard’s arts venue, la Maison d’Art. Delville’s contributions were small and included his Orphée aux Enfers, Parsifal and L’Oracle à Dodone; which are now, apart from Parsifal, in private collections. At the time Delville was in Italy on his prescribed sojourn there after winning the coveted Prix de Rome. The show received largely positive reviews in the press and Delville’s Salons were becoming more widely accepted, despite his aggressive polemics in the months prior to their establishment which hackled his contemporaries. What was noted as a feature of this Idealist art was its intellectual nature and the proclivity towards the expression of ideas.
The final Salon d’Art Idéaliste took place in March 1898 and was marked by the exhibition of Delville’s great masterpiece, his l’Ecole de Platon (1898, Musée D’Orsay), which marked the culmination of his Idealist programme and widely celebrated amongst his contemporary critics, even those who were previously hostile to his art and aesthetic programme.

After 1900

In 1895 Delville published his Dialogue entre nous, a text in which he outlined his views on occultism and esoteric philosophy. Brendan Cole discusses this text in detail his book on Delville, pointing out that, though the Dialogue reflects the ideas of a number of occultists, it also reveals a new interest in Theosophy. In the late 1890s, Delville joined the Theosophical Society. He was probably introduced to Theosophy directly through his friendship with Edouard Schuré, the author of the widely-influential book Les Grandes Initiés. Schuré wrote the preface to Delville’s work on Idealist Art, La Mission de l’Art (1900). Delville also came into close alliance with Annie Besant who inherited the leadership of the Theosophical movement. Besant gave a series of lectures in Brussels in 1899 titled La Sagesse Antique. Delville reviewed her talks in an article published in Le Thyrse that year.[14] It is probably from this point onwards that Delville became actively involved in the Theosophical Movements as such. Delville founded La Lumière, a journal devoted to Theosophical ideas in 1899, and published articles from leading Theosophists of the day, including Besant. Delville became the first General Secretary of the Belgian branch of the Theosophical Society in 1911.
Delville’s art flourished after 1900 and he produced some of his greatest works during this period up to the First World War. He worked with undiminished strength and imagination and his paintings revealed a visionary sense of the transcendental inspired by his involvement in the Theosophical movement, seen typically in works such as his monumental L’Homme-Dieu (1903, Brughes: Groeninge Museum) and Prométhée (1907, Free University Brussels). His most striking achievement, however, is his series of five vast canvases that decorated the Cour d’Assises in the Palais de Justice on the theme of ‘Justice through the Ages’. These works, monumental in conception and scale and no doubt amongst his finest, were unfortunately destroyed during the second World War as a result of German bombing of the Palais de Justice on the 3rd of September 1944. The irony of this action in relation to the theme of this cycle of paintings cannot be overlooked. Small-scale replacements were installed during the reconstruction of the Palais after the War. The gigantic original central painting titled, La Justice, la Loi et la Pitié, measured 11 metres by 4.5 metres. This worked was flanked by two works, La Justice de Moïse and La Justice chrétienne (both 4 by 3 metres). The two remaining panels represents Justice of the past and present: La Justice d’autrefois and La Justice moderne.

Professor at the Glasgow School of Art, 1900-1906

Delville hoped to secure a teaching place at the Academy in Brussels, but was offered instead a teaching position at the flourishing Glasgow School of Art in 1900. His tenure there was highly successful, and the works of the students he trained were celebrated at the annual exhibitions in London. When Delville returned to Brussels in 1907, many of his British students followed him to further their training under his tutelage in his private studio in rue Morris. At that time, Delville fulfilled his ambition to teach at the Brussels Academy and was appointed Professor of Life Studies, a post he held until his retirement in 1937.

The First World War: Exile in London 1914-18

When War broke out, Delville, amongst many Belgians, were welcomed in Britain as exiles. He moved there with his entire family, including his wife and four younger children and settled in Golders Green in London. His two oldest sons, Elie and Raphaël Delville, were conscripted into the Belgian War Effort (both survived the conflict). Delville played an active role in London, through his writings, art and public addresses (he was a gifted orator) in support of the Belgians in exile and the conflict against the Germans. He edited a newspaper in London, L’Indépendence Belge, wrote several articles and poems virulently condemning German aggression. He founded, with other Belgian refugees, La Ligue des Patriotes, and was instrumental in the creation of the publication Belgian Art in Exile the sale of which raised money for Belgian charities in England. The work contains a great number of representative paintings and other works of art by contemporary Belgian artists. At that time Delville was also an active Freemason and established La Loge Albert 1er to reunite Belgian Freemasons in exile living in Britain.
His time in exile also inspired several important paintings, including: Les Mères (1919), depicting a group of mourning mothers surrounded by dead corpses of their fallen sons, La Belgique indomptable (1919), depicting a sword-wielding female figure holding off an attacking eagle, and Sur l’Autel de la patrie (1918), a modern pieta depicting a female figure with the corpse of a bleeding dead soldier at her feet. His most notable work of this period is his Les Forces (completed in 1924), depicting two vast celestial armies confronting each other. The forces of light, represented on the right, are led by a Christ-like figure seated on a horse and a torch-bearing winged figure leading an army of angels into the fray against a battalion of dark forces streaming in from the left. The work is on open display in the Palais de Justice in the vast ‘cour des pas perdus’ and is grand in scale, measuring 5 metres by 8 metres.

The ‘Société de l’Art Monumental’ 1920

From an early point in his career Delville was interested in producing art that would be displayed in public spaces for the edification of all. For him, art was a means of uplifting the public, and to this end he despised art that was produced for an elite clique, sold by dealers for the benefit of collectors who saw in art no more than an investment opportunity. Delville’s ideals were strongly aligned to the idea of a social purpose for art, about which he wrote extensively during his career. In his Mission de l’Art he wrote: ‘If the purpose of Art, socially speaking, is not to spiritualise the weighted thinking of the public, then one has the right to ask oneself, what is truly its usefulness, or more precisely, its purpose’.
Although he had already created several large artistic schemes that decorated public buildings, notably his panels for the Palais de Justice, his ambition formally to pursue this aim was finally realised in 1920 when he collaborated with several leading painters of his generation to create the Société de l’Art Monumental (Society for Monumental Art). The aim of the group was to bring together painters, artists and architects who would draw attention to the need for art specifically created for public buildings.
An important realisation of this aim was the decoration of the walls in the colonnades of the hemicycles flanking the Arcade of the Parc du Cinquantenaire. Five artists collaborated with Delville on this project: Constant Montald, Emile Vloors, Omer Dierickx, Emile Fabry and Albert Ciamberlani. The last two were friends of Delville’s since his days at the Academy and had collaborated on many project before. Most of these artists had also exhibited in Delville’s Idealist forums, Pour L’Art and the Salons d’Art Idéaliste during the 1890s.
The project went ahead under the patronage of King Albert I, and was paid for through a scheme of national subscription.
The overall theme of this major cycle of works was a patriotic commemoration of ‘The Glorification of Belgium’ following the Great War through allegorical images relating to War and peace. In 1924 Delville expressed his idea for the cycle as a ‘vision of a frieze in mosaic unfurling its rhythm of lines and its harmony of colours between the columns of the hemicycle’
Each artist prepared six individual works (cartoons) that were then adapted to the final mosaics which were three metres high and aligned to the top part of the wall. The total distance of all the mosaics was 120 metres. An overall harmony of all the individual panels was achieved by ensuring that the artists adhered to a few common rules of composition: using the same horizon line, using the same scale for the figures, and adhering to a limited palette of related colours. The specific theme to the left of the arcade is that of Belgium at peace. Works by Fabry, Vloors and Montald represented respectively: the material life, intellectual life and moral life. The specific theme to the right side represent heroic Belgium, with works by Delville, Ciamberlani and Dierickx representing respectively: Victory, the Tribute to Heroes and War.
The project was conceived between 1922 and 1926 and completed in 1932. The mosaics themselves were executed by Jean Lahaye and Emile Van Asbroeck of the company A Godchol.
This monumental creation was a vindication of Idealist trends in art presented in a public space and gave his artistic perspective a wider visibility amongst the general public.
Working towards the public good and alleviating the suffering of mankind was also a principle ideal of the Theosophists, an ideal to which Delville’s subscribed throughout his life. Delville’s Theosophical-socialist views were articulated in two articles his published before the War: Socialisme de demain (1912) and Du Principe sociale de l’Art (1913).

Later Years

From the 1920s onwards, Delville experienced a much more settled and successful career than ever before. With the highly successful completion of the two major public projects in the Palais de Justice and the Cinquantenaire, and his election as a member of the prestigious Belgian Royal Academy of sciences and letters in 1924, he seemed to have been drawn much closer into the Belgian establishment during these years. He maintained his post as ‘Premier Professeur’ at the Academy of Fine Art in Brussels until 1937 and continued to paint until crippling arthritis in his right hand forced him to give up the brush in 1947.

His ambition to create large-scale Idealist works of art was sustained right up to the end of his painting career after the second World War; notable examples amongst which include his Les Forces (1924, 55 x 800 cm, Palais de Justice), Les Dernières Idoles (1931, 450 x 300 cm, private collection) and La Roue du Monde (1940, 298 x 231 cm, Antwerp: Royal Musem of Fine Art). He was still able to sustain a power of expression and a highly articulate finish to his works in his later years that was there from the very start. However, a change in his style took place amongst some of his works in the 1930s, (especially while he was resident in Mons). Characteristically they became more paired-down in their articulation of form and colour: Shapes became more stylised and geometric and his colours were more pallid, or ‘pastel’ in tone, lacking the energy, vibrant contrasts and rich tonalities that was characteristic of his work until then. His treatment of figures also became more stylised and he often articulated their facial features with characteristically ‘almond’-shaped eyes, giving his figures an otherworldy appearance. Typical examples of this period include his Seraphitus-Seraphita (1932), Les Idées (1934), Le Dieu de la Musique (1937) and Pégase (1938).

Delville remained a committed and passionate Theosophist until his death in 1953 and he maintained in one of his biographies that this always formed the foundation to this moral and artistic perspective throughout his later life. Regarding this important aspect of his intellectual and spiritual life, he wrote in 1944:

En réalité, la philosophie occulte occupe le fond de ma pensée depuis bien des années ! Je pense avoir lu à peu près tout ce qui fut publié d’important sur les problèmes de l’invisible. … Depuis, j’ai beaucoup cherché, étudié sur la nature des phénomènes psychiques. L’Etude des sciences occultes est à la base de ma vie intellectuelle et morale.

Delville died on his birthday, 19 January 1953.

Theory and Technique

Idealist theory

Delville wrote prolifically throughout his life outlining his Idealist aesthetic. His first main publication on the subject was his Mission de l’Art (1900). Delville’s Idealist theory is a syncretic formulation of traditional Idealist thinking (in the tradition of Plato, Schopenhauer and Hegel) and contemporary esoteric philosophy. In summary, Delville believed that art is the expression of the Ideal (or spiritual) in material form and is founded on the principle of Ideal Beauty, in other words Beauty that is the manifestation of the Ideal, or spiritual realm, in physical objects. Contemplating objects that manifest Ideal Beauty allows us to perceive, if only fleetingly, the spiritual dimension and we are transfigured as a result.

Delville outlines this in a vivid passage in his La Mission de l’Art where he emphasises the expressive value of Idealist art, in other words, that it is not merely a question of engaging passively with the image, but it is also about feeling the ‘energy’ that it radiates, which uplifts and transforms the consciousness of the viewer, in a spiritual way. Idealism in art is, he writes, ‘the introduction of Spirituality into Art’. For Delville, the Idea is an expression of he Ideal realm, and it is a living force within human experience that dwells within the transpersonal realm of human experience. He writes further that:

The Idea, in the metaphysical or esoteric sense, is Force, the universal and divine force which moves worlds, and its movement is the supreme rhythm whence springs the harmonious working of Life.

Where there is no thought, there is no life, no creation. The modern western world has become unconscious of this tremendous power of the Ideal, and Art inevitably has thus become degraded. This ignorance of the creative forces of thought has, nevertheless, obscured and diverted towards materialism all modern judgement. Materialism does not know how ideas and thoughts vibrate, and how these vibrations impinge on the consciousness of the individual.
And yet these vibrations, though invisible to the greater part of mankind, are able to exercise an astounding influence over the mentality of human beings, and thus assist in their evolution. Before works of genius the human consciousness receives mental and spiritual vibrations, which are generated by the force of the idea reflected. The more elevated, pure and sublime a work is, the more the inner being, coming into contact with the ideal vibrations emanated from it, will be raised, purified, and made sublime. The artist who is not ideal, that is to say, artist who does not know that every form must be the result of an idea, and that every idea must have its form, the artist, in short, who does not know that Beauty is the luminous conception of equilibrium in forms, will never have any influence over the soul, because his works will be really without thought, that is, without life.

The Idea is the emotion of the Spirit as Emotion is the reflex of the Soul.

Delville goes further by dividing his understanding of Beauty into three categories: I) Spiritual Beauty: the source of beauty in physical objects, ii) Formal beauty: the physical articulation of Beauty in works of art, and iii) Technical beauty: the specific execution of line, colour, light and shade, and composition to express Ideal beauty in physical objects and works of art. In French Delville referred to these terms as: La Beauté spirituelle, La Beauté plastique and La Beauté technique. Delville goes further to map his threefold conception of Beauty onto his esoteric conception of the threefold nature of reality, consisting of the Natural, Human and Divine realms, as well as the threefold nature of man as body (senses), soul (feeling) and mind (thought and spirituality). He writes:

The work of Idealist Art is therefore that which will harmonise in itself the three great Words of Life: the Natural, the Human and the Divine. To attain this degree of aesthetic balance, – which, I am happy to concede, is not within the reach of just anyone! – one must find within the work the purest idea on an intellectual level, the most beautiful form within the artistic realm, and the most perfect technique in terms of execution. Without an idea, a work misses its intellectual mission, without form, it misses its natural mission and, without technique, it misses its goal of perfection. … The veritable character of the work of Idealist Art can be identified from the balance reigning over its accomplishment, meaning that it does not let the essential terms of idea, art or technique prevail one over the other, but more likely according to relations proportional to their respective powers.

The Classical Tradition

Delville believed that the purest expression of Idealist art was to be found in the Classical Tradition of ancient Greek art and the High Renaissance. For him, Classical art was the purest expression of the spiritual in material form. Delville sought to reinterpret the Classical idiom in a contemporary context, to suite, in other words his specific Idealist style of art that he was formulating during the 1890s; not simply, in other words, to copy or imitate classical modes of art. The expression of harmony and equilibrium, which he saw as an essential aspect of Classical art, were fundamental in the expression of the spiritual in natural forms. There is a mystical aspect to Delville’s aesthetic, and idea of Ideal Beauty, when he wrote that:

The Beautiful, taken in its classical sense, is not an illusion. The Beautiful is the True manifested by the Idea in form. This is the highest goal that the artist must seek to attain … When the artist causes light to spring forth from darkness, beauty from ugliness, the pure from the impure, he reveals Truth to humanity, he reveals God. The Beautiful, the True, the Good are synonyms. It is the glory of Art to be able to make perceptible to human eyes the three mysteries which form a single one!

Idealist Art

Delville developed a distinct style in his painting, which is unmistakeable. His finished drawing and paintings are highly articulate and precise in the way he renders forms. However, his works are not overbearingly detailed, as is often found in realist art, but he manages to capture the essence of the forms he articulates using the simplest means possible. This is especialy so in his aproach to figures. In his l’Amour des Ames he outlines the figures using long, curvaceous contours, and their anatomy is only lightly suggested using gentle contrasts in light and shade; the effect is the expression of great beauty without being overbearingly sensual: a technique often seen in Renaissance frescos. Delville had a great imagination for colour and its use for expressive purposes. His colours are often vivid, almost visionary; most clearly seen in his Trésors de Sathan which is bathed in an atmosphere of luminous golds and yellows. In his L’Ange des Splendeurs he captures the effect of irridescent, diaphanous gold in the angel’s drapery contrasting distinctly with the heavy earthiness of the natural details (animals, spiders, vegetation) at bottom right hand side. His Ecole de Platon is a paradigm of serenity in is use of muted, cool colours and pastel shades to emphasise the intellectual idyll of Plato’s Akademos.
Delville very seldom painted landscapes, still lifes or portraits for their own sake, but often incorporated these in his figure paintings. Almost all of Delville’s paintings focus on the human form as the bearer of the drama of his works. He was a master of the articulation of human anatomy which he used to express vividly his Idealist technique and ideas. The varous ways he articulates the human form is key to understanding his artistic programme that he unveiled in his paintings throughout his career. This is especially the case in the rendering of lithe and supple male and female figures in his Les Trésors de Sathan, L’Amour des Ames and L’Ecole de Platon, or the highly expressive drawn, sinewy almost emaciated forms in the lower part of his epic l’Homme-Dieu displaying the suffering and distress of the human condition; or in the highly muscular, Titanesque rendering of anatomy in his heroic figures in his Prométhée and Les Dernières Idoles.


In his biography, Delville’s son Olivier tells us that his father, determined to pass his ideals on to the world, was continually painting and writing. He supplemented this unreliable income by teaching art, but his busy professional life did not prevent him from applying his strongly held beliefs to his personal life. Olivier describes his father as a person of courage, perseverance, probity and intellect, as well as an upright family man who was strict with his six children.


Delville is still not nearly as well known as some of his contemporaries of the Symbolist era. There are historical reasons for this. For instance, he never exhibited at the main exhibition societies in Brussels during the early part of his career, such as Les XX and La Libre Esthétique. The reputations of many of his contemporaries, like Khnopff, Mellery and Ensor, were largely founded on their participation at these Societies, which promoted heavily their art through organised marketing campaigns, and by establishing a commercial network of dealers and collectors to invest in the art exhibited there. They were also very successful in making their art well-known internationally. There was an overt commercial element associated with these societies in they way they created an aura about the art exhibited there as a desirable commodity. Delville shunned the commercialisation of art and the way it was manufactured as an elite commodity. Although he sold works at his own Societies, such as Pour l’Art and the Salons d’Art Idéaiste, their purpose was mainly to create a forum for artists working in an idealist vein. Delville was mainly committed to using art as a force to transform society and to improve the lives of those around him. He wrote: ‘there will be nothing to prevent art increasingly to become an educative force in society, conscious of its mission. It is time to penetrate society with art, with the ideal and with beauty. Today’s society tends to fall increasingly into instinct. It is saturated with materialism, sensualism and … commercialism’.
Delville believed, rather, that a respiritulaisation of society would be a redeeming path to rescue it from the morbidity of materialism. Elsewhere he wrote: ‘Idealism … has a universalizing educational and social impact … Idealism sees humanity in terms of the immense vitality of his ideal future. In order for the artist to become aware of this, it is necessary for him to purify and elevate himself. … The role of modern idealism will be to draw the artistic temperament away from the deadly epidemics of materialism … and finally to guide him towards the purified regions of an art that is the harbinger of future spirituality.’

Delville remained desperately poor during the early part of his career and his condition was only occasionally relieved by the stipend associated with the Prix de Rome that he won as well as his employment at the Glasgow School of Art, and later the Ecole des beaux-arts. Delville never sold to dealers and only very seldom took on private commissions for portraits (a genre he would have excelled in). Most of his paintings were on a grand scale and he devised these mostly to be exhibited in public spaces, following his ideal of the social role of art. Thus, the poor reputation associated with Delville’s art is in part probably related to the lack of any committed exposure and sustained marketing of his work, which was essential in forging the reputations of the early avant garde and afterwards. Delville also came from a working class background which was a huge disadvantage in the contemporary bourgeois-dominated culture in Belgium. This would certainly have contributed to the erasure of his worth as an artist over time. And finally Delville was fiercely independent in his approach to promoting his ideas and artistic ideals, seldom bending to the will of what was popular or acceptable in conservative bourgeois circles that controlled and dominated the art market during his formative years. Mainstrem critics and peers generally shunned his Art and ideals as a result. Despite his immense talent and vision, Delville remained a ‘voice in the wilderness’ during this time. This reputation persisted during the course of his life and afterwards as well.

Another great disadvantage related to Delville’s reputation relates to the limited exposure of his major works in public museums, and the relative paucity of published material (until recently) concerning Delville’s art and career. The Museum of Fine Art in Brussels houses, by far, more works than any public collection, but few of these are on public display. This is also the case in other centres in Belgium (Bruges and Antwerp, for example). Few of his works are to be seen in major museums outside Belgium; with the exception of his l’Ecole de Platon in the Musée d’Orsay in Paris. Many of his smaller works have long since disappeared or have been destroyed, which leaves conspicuous lacunae in his catalogue of extant works. The loss of major paintings like his Cycle passionnel and La Justice à traverse les ages, amongst others also diminishes the impact of his known oeuvre. Moreover, a great number of his works are in private collections and their whereabouts still needs to be determined. This all means that access to his works is extremely limited and they remain out of the ‘public eye’, and hence the collective imagination generally. Reproductions of some of his paintings and drawings are available on the Internet, but usually of poor quality which reduces their impact considerably. Finally, until very recently, there have been no major studies or monographs on the artist’s work, which until now has left considerable gaps in our understanding of his life, art and ideas.

Despite this, a resurgence of interest in his work and ideas appears to be taking place, notably with the recent important retrospective exhibition in Namur that brought together many important paintings and drawings, many of which have not been seen before in public since they were first exhibited in the nineteenth century. Several Belgian and English Art Historians, working in collaboration with Delville’s heirs and estate, are also taking an renewed interest in Delville’s work, revealing detailed aspects of his life and work for the first time through detailed studies and monographs on aspects of Delville’s life and art (see ‘Sources’).

Selected Works of Art

Prints and Drawings

  • L’Agonie de Cachaprès (1887), charcoal on paper, 33 x 34.5 cm. Brussels: Musée d’Ixelles, inv. CL240
  • Tristan et Yseult, (1887), pencil and charcoal on paper, 44.3 x 75.4 cm. Brussels: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique, inv. 7927.
  • Le Deniere Sommeil (1888), charcoal, 44 x 57 cm. Private collection (Portrait of his grandmother on her death bed)
  • Mendiants à Paris (1888), pencil on paper, 48.2 x 66.2 cm. Tournai: Musée des beaux-arts.
  • Les Las d’Aller (1890), pencil on paper, 8.7 x 10.7 cm. Tournai: Musée des Beaux-arts.
  • study for Le Cycle des passions, (1890), Bruxelles: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique.
  • Allégorie de l’enfer (Azraël), (1890). Private collection.
  • Parsifal (1890), charcoal on paper, 70.7 x 56 cm. Private collection.
  • L’Idole de la perversité (1891), pencil on paper, 98.5 x 56.5 cm. Private collection.
  • La Méduse (1891), pencil, ink and mixed media, 15.2 x 35.6 cm. Chicago: Chicago Institute of Art.
  • Portrait de Madame Stuart Merrill or Mysteriosa, pastel, (1892), pencil and coloured pastel on paper, 40 x 32.1 cm. Bruxelles: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique, inv. 12029.


  • La Coulée d’acier (1886)
  • L’Affamé (1887), oil on canvas, 80×100 cm. Private collection (recently rediscovered).
  • La Symbolisation de la Chair et de l’Esprit (1890), location unknown.
  • La Morte d’Orphée (1893), oil on canvas, 79.3 x 99.2 cm. Brussels: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique, inv. 12209.
  • Le Christ glorifié par les enfants (1894), oil on canvas, 222 x 247 cm. Antwerp: Academy of Fine Arts (Prix de Rome entry).
  • L’Ange des Splendeurs (1894), oil on canvas, 127 x 146 cm. Brussels: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique, inv. GC179.
  • Portrait du grand maître de la Rose-Croix, Joséphin Péladan en habit de chœur, 1894, oil on canvas, 242 x 112 cm. Nîmes: musée des Beaux-arts
  • Les Trésors de Satan, 1895, oil on canvas, 258 x 268 cm. Brussels: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique, inv. 4575.
  • L’Oracle à Dodone (1896), oil on canvas, 118 x 170 cm. Private collection.
  • L’École de Platon, (1898), oil on canvas, 260 x 605 cm. Paris: Musée d’Orsay, inv. RF1979-34.
  • L’Amour des âmes (1900), tempera and oil on canvas, 268 x 150 cm. Brussels: Musée communal des beaux-arts d’Ixelles, inv. 1942.
  • Homme-Dieu, (1903), oil on canvas, 500 x 500 cm. Bruges: Groeningemuseum.
  • Prométhée (1907), oil on canvas, 500 x 250 cm. Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles.
  • La Justice à traverse les ages, (1911–14) Palais de Justice de Bruxelles; detroyed by German bombing at the end of WWII
  • L’Oubli des passions (1913), oil on canvas, 169 x 146 cm. Private collection.
  • Le Génie vainqueur (1914), oil on canvas, 460 x 350 cm (?). Brussels: Palais de Justice.
  • Portrait de la femme de l’artiste, (1916). Bruxelles: Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique.
  • Sur l’autel de la patrie (1918), oil on canvas, 305 x 205. Brussels, Royal Academy of Fine Art.
  • Les Mères (1919), oil on canvas, 112 x 144 cm. Dinant: City collection, inv. 203.
  • Dante buvant les eaux de Léthé (1919), 142 x 179 cm. Private collection.
  • La Belgique indomptable (1919), oil on canvas, 177 x 127 cm. Location unknown.
  • Les forces (1924), oil on canvas, 500 x 800 cm. Brussels: Palais de la Justice.
  • Hélène, le fille du Cyne (1928), oil on canvas, 205 x 135 cm. Private collection.
  • L’Ecole du Silence (1929), oil on canvas, 180 x 153 cm. Taiwan: Chi Mei Museum.
  • Les ténebrès à la lumière (1929), oil on canvas, 205.5 x 93.5 cm. Private collection.
  • Le dieu vaincu par l’amour (1930). Private collection
  • Les Femmes d’Eleusis, (1931), oil on canvas, 110 x 140 cm. Tournai: Musée des Beaux-arts.
  • Le Secret de la Tombe (1931), oil on canvas, 135 x 195 cm. Private collection.
  • Les dernières idoles (1931), oil on canvas, 450 x 300 cm. Private collection
  • Seraphitus-Sepraphita (1932), oil on canvas, 187 x 103 cm. Private collection.
  • L’Extase de Danté (1932), oil on canvas, 159 x 53.5. Private collection.
  • Le rêve de l’amour (1933), triptych, oil on canvas, 133 x 298 cm. Private collection.
  • Le Christ en Deuil (1933), oil on canvas, 200 x 215 cm. Private collection.
  • Les Idées (1934), oil on canvas, 210 x 280 cm. Private collection.
  • La Libération (1936), oil on canvas, 180 x 250 cm. Private collection.
  • Le Dieu de la Musique (1937), oil on canvas, 240 x 146 cm. Brussels: Conservatoire Royale.
  • Le voile de la nuit (1937), oil on canvas, 168 x 127. Private collection.
  • Les quatres Kumaras (1938), oil on canvas, 112 x 56 cm. Private collection.
  • Pegasus (1938), oil on canvas, 114 x 95 cm. Mons: Musée de Beaux-arts de Belgique, inv. 285.
  • Le Fléau or La Force (1940), oil on canvas, 135 x 194 cm, Brussels: Galerie Uzal.
  • La Roue du monde (1940), oil on canvas, 298 x 231.1 cm. Antwerp: Royal museum of Fine Art, inv. 2607.
  • Les ames errantes (1942), oil on canvas, 150 x 330 cm. Private collection.
  • La vision de la Paix (1947), oil on canvas, 100 x 120 cm, private collection

Published works by Jean Delville


  • Le Sens de la Vie (n.d.).
  • L’Idéal Messianique (n.d.)
  • Dialogue Entre Nous. Argumentation Kabbalistique, Occultiste, Idéaliste (Bruges: Daveluy Frères, 1895).
  • La Mission de l’Art. Etude d’Esthétique Idéaliste. Préface d’Edouard Schuré (Bruxelles: Georges Balat, 1900).
  • Le Mystère de l’Évolution ou de la Généalogie de l’Homme d’après la Théosophie (Bruxelles: H. Lamertin, (1905).
  • Problèmes de la Vie Moderne (Bruxelles: “En Art”, 1905).
  • Dieu en Nous. Essai Théosophique d’Emancipation Spirituelle. Conférence Faite à la Branche Centrale Belge de la Société Théosophique (Bruxelles: c.1905).
  • Le Christ Reviendra, Le Christ en Face de l’Eglise et de la Science (Paris : Editions Théosophiques, 1913).
  • Discours prononcé par M. Jean Delville, Professeur, à l’occasion de la Distribution des Prix de l’Année 1921-1922, Ville de Bruxelles:Académie Royale des Beaux-Arts et Ecole des Arts Décoratifs (Bruxelles: E Guyot, 1923).
  • La Grande Hiérarchie Occulte et la Venue d’un Instructeur Mondial (Bruxelles: Les Presses Tilbury, 1925).
  • Considérations Sur L’Art Moderne, Ledeberg-Gand, Imprimerie Jules de Vreese, 1926 (Extrait du Bulletin Des Commissions Royales d’Art & d’Archéologie LXV e Année, 1926).
  • Krishnamurti, Révélateur des Temps Nouveaux (Bruxelles: Office de Publicité, 1928).
  • La Création d’un Conseil Supérieur des Beaux-Arts. Voeu de la Classe de Beaux-Arts de l’Académie Royale de Belgique (Bruxelles: Lamertin, 1935).

Poetry anthologies

  • Les Horizons Hantés (Bruxelles: 1892).
  • Le Frisson du Sphinx (Bruxelles: H Lamertin, 1897).
  • Les Splendeurs Méconnues (Bruxelles: Oscar Lamberty, 1922).
  • Les Chants dans la Clarté (Bruxelles: à l’enseigne de l’oiseau bleu, 1927).


  • Brendan Cole, Jean Delville, Art between Nature and the Absolute, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.
  • Brendan Cole, ‘Jean Delville and the Belgian Avant-Garde : Anti-Materialist Polemics for ‘un art annonciateur des spiritualités futures’, in Rosina Neginsky (ed.), Symbolism. Its Origins and Its Consequences, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010, pp. 129–146.
  • Miriam Delville, ‘Jean Delville, mon grand-père’ in Laoureux, et al. Jean Delville, Maître de l’idéal, Paris: Somogy éditions d’art, 2014, pp. 14–36.
  • Olivier Delville, Jean Delville, peintre, 1867-1953, Brussels: Laconti, 1984.
  • Michel Draguet (ed.), Splendeurs de l’Idéal. Rops, Khnopff, Delville et leur temps. Liège: Musée de l’Art wallon, du 17 octobre décembre 1997.
  • Donald Flanell Friedman, « L’évocation du Liebestod par Jean Delville », in La Peinture (d)écrite, Textyles, n° 17-18. Bruxelles: Le Cri Édition, 2000, pp. 79–84.
  • Denis Laoureux, et al., Jean Delville (1867-1953) Maitre de l’idéal. Paris: Somogy éditions d’art, 2014.
  • Francine-Claire Legrand, Le Symbolisme en Belgique Brussels: Laconti, 1971.
  • Francine-Claire Legrand, ‘Jean Delville peintre Idéaliste’, in Olivier Delville, Jean Delville, peintre, 1867-1953, Brussels: Laconti, 1984, pp. 62–94.

Delville: Quick Summary:

Born Jean Libert
January 19, 1867
Louvain, Belgium
Died January 19, 1953 (aged 86)
Forest, Brussels, Belgium
Nationality Belgian
Education Ecole des Beaux-arts, Brussels
Known for Painting, poetry, essayist, teaching
Notable work Tristan et Yseult, (1887)
Le Cycle passionnel (1890; destroyed)
La Symbolisation de la Chair et de l’Esprit (1890)
L’Idole de la perversité (1891)
Mysteriosa. Portrait de Mme Stuart Merrill (1892)
La Morte d’Orphée (1893)
L’Ange des splendeurs (1894)
Les Trésors de Sathan (1895)
L’Ecole de Platon (1898)
L’Homme-Dieu (1903)
Prométhée (1907)
Le Justice à traverse les ages (1911-14; destroyed)
Les forces (1924)
Les dernières idoles (1931)
La Roue du monde (1940)
Style Classical idealist
Movement Idealist art (Symbolist art)
Spouse Marie Delville (née Lesseine; married: 29 October 1893)
Awards Prix de Rome (1895)
Silver medal: L’Amour des Ames; Universal Exhibition, Paris (1900)
Gold medal: L’Ecole de Platon; Universal exhibition, Milan (1906)
Elected Member of the Jury: Belgian Prix de Rome (1904)
Premier professeur: Academie des beaux-arts, Brussels (1907)
General Secretary: Belgian Section, Theosophical Society (1911-14)
Member: Commission Royale des Monuments de Belgique (1919)
Decorated: Grand Officier de l’Ordre de Léopold (1921)
Member: l’Académie royal des sciences et des letters et des beaux-arts de Belgique (1924)
President: Fédération Nationale des Artistes Peintres et Sculpteurs de Belgique (1926)
Memorial open-air bust on plinth: avenue des Sept Bonniers, Brussels

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s